On Thursday, 13 October 2022 at 01:33:54 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 10/12/22 17:52, ItIsEncapsulatedOrItisNot wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 October 2022 at 00:46:09 UTC,
ItIsEncapsulatedOrItisNot
> wrote:
Creative new name. However, although access rights are related
to encapsulation, they don't provide it. Encapsulation is
encapsulation.
> My programs are now clearer than ever, has less bugs, and
still work,
> just fine.
If you removed all private keywords from your programs
absolutely nothing would change.
Ali
I don't think of 'private' as an 'access right'.
I think of it as a programmer assertion - in that it asserts the
scope that I want to apply to that property of the class (and to
which i expect the compiler to uphold that assertion).
Of course I don't need this in functions, since scope is always
local to the function (except when its not).
