On Tuesday, 23 January 2024 at 06:30:08 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
That being said, I expect that it would be pretty easy to write
a mixin to do something like that if you really wanted to.
Also, if you're simply looking to not have to name the type,
you could do
dataGrid = new typeof(datagrid)(15);
- Jonathan M Davis
You like to turn off people before they get the chance to develop
further, this is bad
You should try more languages, it'll be eye opener
``dataGrid = new typeof(datagrid)(15);`` is both, verbose and ugly
Besides, you seem to have missed this:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/e2ca557ab9d3e60305a37da0d5b58299e0a9de0e/DIPs/DIP1044.md
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/14650
It could be expanded with structs/classes
So your "it can't be done" argument is already wrong
