Timon Gehr kirjoitti 31.8.2024 klo 18.44:
On 8/31/24 17:41, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 8/30/24 22:36, Dukc wrote:
> He said that going forward, accepting a bad DIP would be less
consequential than it had been in the past once we had editions. In
the worst case, we'd have one thing more to maintain in an
intermediate edition before it was fixed. Maybe that was a
calculation we could take into consideration. Átila said that was a
good point.
You should be at least as worried about the damage to contributor
morale on a bad decision as about the damage to the language.
Editions do good job limiting the latter but not the former. If you
accept that you can see why this attitude is unnerving.
Rejecting a DIP can be one of those bad decisions.
Good point. It's easier to accept a DIP with popular pressure behind
when there's a way to back off if necessary.
