Max Samukha wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:42:01 +0100, Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think that's an OPTLINK bug -- that obj file seems to be
Summary: Unexpected OPTLINK termination
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
optlink fails to link an object file compiled with dmd 2.020 with -g or -gc
CL: link test,,,user32+kernel32/co/noi;
Then I think it's both dmd and optlink bug. The former is buggy
because it produces invalid object file. The latter cannot gracefully
recover from invalid input, so it's buggy as well.
I checked again, and the obj file seems to be OK. So I'm wrong about
that -- it's just an OPTLINK problem.
And it's a really complicated obj file! Provide the source
code for the smallest case which reproduces the problem.
Changing/removing seemingly arbitrary stuff makes the error disappear.
I don't have a smaller example yet.
Yeah. But it probably won't get fixed unless you can simplify it.
Mind you, OPTLINK is unlikely to get fixed, anyway. But maybe Walter can
change DMD slightly to work around the optlink bug.
#1439 shows that something bad happens when the symbol length is a
particular length (out-by-1 error?). I think this is quite likely to be
the same issue, since you have so many templates in there.
Is it the same as #1439?