http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924





------- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-26 12:05 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> To date, every use of writefln I've seen has been run time. So it doesn't seem
> particularly ambiguous at least to me,

That's because at the moment writefln can only be executed at run time.  If it
(or something resembling it) becomes executable at compile time, it could just
as well be either as and when compiled or during CTFE.

Having a difference between pragma(msg) and pragma(writefln) beyond what they
say on the tin would be arbitrary and confusing.


-- 

Reply via email to