http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2497





------- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-12-06 23:23 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> It's undefined.  Comparing to Java doesn't make much sense here, since the 
> only
> way an object can go away in Java is if no references refer to it, so there's
> no way to have a reference to an object that has been collected.  

Fair enough.  It would be useful to note that accessing a deleted class through
the reference is undefined.  Otherwise it might leave others guessing.


-- 

Reply via email to