http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2507
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|[email protected] |[email protected] ------- Comment #1 from [email protected] 2008-12-11 16:46 ------- This is a slightly weird situation. Windows does actually claim Posix compliance provided you have the proper subsystem installed (I think it's even bundled as a part of the OS with Vista), so I think the proper behavior should be to treat Windows Posix support as simply not yet implemented, just like Solaris, etc. Given this, the headers are already implemented correctly. The compile errors are intended, and serve as an easy means of determining, by the errors, what functionality must be added to support some new configuration. That said, I'd suggest not actually using the Posix features of Windows, since they're poorly implemented. If you need something in the Windows headers that aren't currently there, perhaps that should be submitted as a separate issue? --
