What    |Removed                     |Added
            Summary|Typedef promotions spec     |Typedef/enum promotions spec
                   |ambiguous - ultimate base   |ambiguous - ultimate base
                   |type or lowest common       |type or lowest common
                   |denominator?                |denominator?

------- Comment #1 from  2008-12-31 11:27 -------
Issue 633 has been reduced to this one.  Whatever the spec is fixed to say, it
must also avoid any ambiguity in what happens when mixed enum/typedef chains
are involved.  This will only be an issue if the ultimate base type route is
chosen - going by lowest common denominator naturally addresses this.


Reply via email to