http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2628
------- Comment #4 from [email protected] 2009-01-28 10:31 ------- What about allowing a template signature for opIndex T opIndex(size_t i)(); that is only valid if there's no classical opIndex defined. For types with such an opIndex, rewrite instance[j] as instance.opIndex!(j)() for compile-time constant indices. opSlice could get the same treatment. While it'd still be a special case, it'd be one that could just be added to the list of operator overloads without confusing people unduly. --
