dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from ZHOU Zhenyu (rin...@goozo.net)'s article
BigInt b = "100000";
foreach( i; 1..20 ){
    b*=10;
    writeln(b*b);
}
system: Windows
CPU: Intel Core2 Duo T7250 2.00GHz
result:
1000000000000
100000000000000
10000000000000000
1000000000000000000
100000000000000000000
10000000000000000000000
999981553255926290448384
100000000000000000000000000
10000000000000000000000000000
1000000000000000000000000000000
100000000000000000000000000000000
10000000000000000000000000000000000
1000000000000000000000000000000000000
100000000000000000000000000000000000000
10000000000000000000000000000000000000000
999999999999999999999981553255926290448384
100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
9999999999999999999999999981553255926290448384
1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


Yep, I can reproduce that on Windows on an Athlon 64 X2.  You're _not_ just 
going
crazy.  Please file a Bugzila.

I don't think that will ever get fixed (unless you make a patch yourself). Phobos BigInt was created by Janice, and she seems to have completely disappeared. I'm working on Tango BigInt, which is completely independent, and will replace Phobos BigInt eventually. ( == as soon as we get a common namespace to put it into). I don't think anyone is interested in debugging Phobos BigInt.

Reply via email to