http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2657





------- Comment #2 from shro8...@vandals.uidaho.edu  2009-02-13 11:38 -------

A better solution would be to define i++ in terms of ++i and require the
compiler to do the value preservation as a copy or by delaying the function
call until after the value is used.


-- 

Reply via email to