------- Comment #8 from  2009-02-25 20:46 -------
It undocumented but widely used. IMHO better use them for mangled name than
DW_AT_name. Current way violates DWARF:

"Because the names of program objects described by DWARF are the names as they
appear in the source program, implementations of language translators that use
some form of mangled name (as do many implementations of C++) should use the
unmangled form of the name in the DWARF DW_AT_name attribute, including the
keyword operator (in names such as “operator +”), if present. Sequences of
multiple whitespace characters may be compressed."


Reply via email to