http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2730
s...@iname.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |s...@iname.com
------- Comment #1 from s...@iname.com 2009-03-20 20:10 -------
opIndexAssign will always be needed for something. Library implementations of
AAs and bit arrays are an example.
There should be probably be a choice of defining opIndexAssign or defining
opIndex with a ref return. opIndexAssign could even work for the example code,
if s[i] += 4 were rewritten as s[i] = s[i] + 4 (with i being evaluated only
once) and then expanded into op functions.
The tricky bit is deciding on the logic to use if both are defined....
--
