http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2753
------- Comment #5 from s...@iname.com 2009-03-24 04:26 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) >> int foo(int function() ref goo); // ref parameter >> int goo(int ref function() foo); // ref return in parameter > Providing the place between return type and function name for function > attributes... interesting... Any particular reason you feel it still has to count as a function attribute? --
