http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2625


ma...@pochta.ru changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|                            |http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0
                   |                            |/struct.html
           Keywords|                            |spec




------- Comment #5 from ma...@pochta.ru  2009-04-04 08:19 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Where on that page is the issue addressed?
see "Const and Invariant Structs"

> > I think, broken() is correct, since invariant data can be referenced 
> > directly,
> > so it's incorrect for it to change in time.
> 
> I'm a little puzzled by your use of "correct".
I meant, it's correct that error is given for broken().


-- 

Reply via email to