------- Comment #8 from  2009-04-07 06:25 -------
No.  If you actually read this bug, you'll see that it isn't about lines 11 and
26, but about the fact that ambiguous function pointers are silently accepted.

The errors should be at lines 6 and 20.  If you take out the lines where errors
actually are reported, you'll find that it incorrectly compiles without error
(just checked in 1.043).

Also, if there are Dstress testcases, please check these before proposing to
close a bug.


Reply via email to