What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

------- Comment #2 from  2009-04-23 05:12 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> I'm not sure if it is a bug, this is a correct behaviour to me.
> If you mark your method as abstract it means that there is no body, 
> child class should provide an implementation.

The following compiles correctly, the original code should not link.

interface A {
    void foo ();

abstract class B : A
    abstract void foo ();

void main() {}


Reply via email to