http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3248
--- Comment #12 from assorted <moi...@hotmail.com> 2009-09-07 11:24:37 PDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > As far as I understand it, removing trailing zeros from .8 precision and > > > (c) > > > are the same. > > > > I doubt it ... I think the optimal number of decimal s.f. would depend on > > the > > binary exponent. But I'll experiment when I have time. You are correct, removing trailing zeros from %.8e isn't optimal, but I thought it was at least lossless.. > > You are correct. Some numbers need an extra digit. > Could you maybe provide one? As I did some ranges with nextUp and didn't find any. A near optimal lossless formatting is fine too :) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
