--- Comment #12 from assorted <moi...@hotmail.com> 2009-09-07 11:24:37 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > As far as I understand it, removing trailing zeros from .8 precision and
> > > (c)
> > > are the same.
> > I doubt it ... I think the optimal number of decimal s.f. would depend on
> > the
> > binary exponent. But I'll experiment when I have time.
You are correct, removing trailing zeros from %.8e isn't optimal, but I thought
it was at least lossless..
> You are correct. Some numbers need an extra digit.
Could you maybe provide one?
As I did some ranges with nextUp and didn't find any.
A near optimal lossless formatting is fine too :)
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------