Don <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
         Depends on|302                         |

--- Comment #6 from Don <> 2009-09-25 06:39:29 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> But literals do not simply exist, they must be used somehow. And contracts
> should work somehow. It was questioned in bug 302, whether contracts should be
> called by caller or callee. So this bug can be blocked by 302.

No. That would be a general change to how contracts are done, and is nothing to
do with this bug. Contracts work perfectly fine on function literals. It's just
this case where return type inference is involved where we get a failure in out

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to