http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #4 from David Simcha <dsim...@yahoo.com> 2009-11-01 11:49:58 PST --- 1. I chose to store the bitmask after SENTINEL_POST so that none of the assumptions of the sentinel code (such as that the sentinel is immediately after the data) changes. 2. The fact that setBitMask() is a nested function is a minor holdover from when the design was a little different. If anyone really hates it a lot, it can be refactored. 3. The mixin is because I needed a lot of the same logic in realloc() and extend() and it was complicated enough that I felt it was the lesser of two evils to use a mixin, even with the "variables appearing out of nowhere" magic, rather than duplicate that logic. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
