--- Comment #3 from Bill Baxter <> 2009-11-10 03:59:01 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Seems like there has not been an update on this one for quite along time. That
> is obviously a big issue, there should be a way to merge template overload
> sets, otherwise some great opportunities in using templates are lost. I am
> using templates in Qt bindings for specifying some compile-time information 
> for
> types. My usecase is very similar to that provided by Bill. I would really 
> like
> for this one to be resolved.
> Thanks.

I think I ended up working around this by putting the essential information
into the classes themselves, and then having one Traits template that covered
built-in types.  Another big template did bunches of static structural tests to
tease the needed information out of a class.  

In my case that was sufficient.  But it's certainly more cumbersome to deal
with.   Perhaps you can explain your case in a little more detail and we might
be able to come up with some workaround?

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to