http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1900
--- Comment #3 from Bill Baxter <[email protected]> 2009-11-10 03:59:01 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Seems like there has not been an update on this one for quite along time. That > is obviously a big issue, there should be a way to merge template overload > sets, otherwise some great opportunities in using templates are lost. I am > using templates in Qt bindings for specifying some compile-time information > for > types. My usecase is very similar to that provided by Bill. I would really > like > for this one to be resolved. > Thanks. I think I ended up working around this by putting the essential information into the classes themselves, and then having one Traits template that covered built-in types. Another big template did bunches of static structural tests to tease the needed information out of a class. In my case that was sufficient. But it's certainly more cumbersome to deal with. Perhaps you can explain your case in a little more detail and we might be able to come up with some workaround? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
