http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3557



--- Comment #2 from Tomasz SowiƄski <tomeks...@gmail.com> 2010-01-11 13:33:40 
PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It shouldn't compile, since the constructor isn't marked as pure. But if you
> mark the constructor as pure:
> 
>  pure {
>      this (float f) {
>         this.f = f;
>     }
>  }
> 
> you get:
> bug.d(14): Error: cannot modify const/immutable/inout expression this.f
> 
> So we definitely have a problem.

Yes, I had a feeling compiler should let me have pure ctors..

What about the problem I mentioned at the bottom (if A is a class):

class A {
    float f;
    this (float f) {    // NOT pure
        this.f = f;
    }
    static pure A stworz(float f) {
        return new A(f);
    }
}

This compiles. Should it?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to