--- Comment #5 from 2010-01-28 01:14:41 PST ---
>typeof(item) is int, not foo.

Even then, typeof(foo) is foo, and not int. It's only logical that foo.mangleof
should be the mangle for foo, not int.

I don't know about item.mangelof. Is that even allowed?

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to