http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3167
Eldar Insafutdinov <e.insafutdi...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |e.insafutdi...@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Eldar Insafutdinov <e.insafutdi...@gmail.com> 2010-01-29 15:00:25 PST --- (In reply to comment #10) > I'm going to mark this as invalid, as function return values should be > rvalues, > and rvalues cannot be references, even if the vagaries of the implementation > make that possible. > > The reason is "vagaries of the implementation", so it may work on one > implementation but not another. Currently, whether it (used to) work or not > also depended on the contents of the struct being returned. This test case fails for me with the latest dmd: struct X { } X i() { return X.init; } void foo(const ref X x) { } void foo() { foo(i()); //line 12 } This bug is not invalid. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------