http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3661
--- Comment #6 from Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> 2010-01-31 10:33:45 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Floating-point exponents means the result type must be complex, which at > > least > > for the moment complicates migrating to a library-only implementation of > > complex numbers. > > No, it only means that some results will be NaN's. :) > > But yes, complex result should also be supported, this can be determined when > left operand (base) is also complex (but then in many cases imaginary parts > will be 0, which is waste). -1.0^^0.5 has complex type. > BTW. I don't see anything wrong with compiler implemntation of complex > numbers. > Actually i see them supperior to the library-only implemntation. In that case it would be great if you came forth with the appropriate arguments. We just convinced ourselves that superiority goes the other way around. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
