http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3809
--- Comment #3 from Don <[email protected]> 2010-04-23 12:58:21 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Starting with the simple thing: the missing line number in the division by 0 > error message. > PATCH: interpret.c, near the start of BinExp::interpretAssignCommon(). [snip] Oops, that patch fixed a related test case: struct S { int xx; } int badline() { S s; return 100/s.xx; } static assert(badline()); To fix this one as well, the same patch needs to applied to interpret.c, getVarExp(), around line 1250. if (v->init) { if (v->init->isVoidInitializer()) { error(loc, "variable %s is used before initialization", v->toChars()); return EXP_CANT_INTERPRET; } e = v->init->toExpression(); e = e->interpret(istate); } else // This should never happen { - e = v->type->defaultInitLiteral(); + e = v->type->defaultInitLiteral(loc); } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
