http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3809



--- Comment #3 from Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> 2010-04-23 12:58:21 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Starting with the simple thing: the missing line number in the division by 0
> error message.
> PATCH:  interpret.c, near the start of BinExp::interpretAssignCommon().
[snip]

Oops, that patch fixed a related test case:

struct S { int xx; }
int badline() { S s; return 100/s.xx; }
static assert(badline());

To fix this one as well, the same patch needs to applied to interpret.c,
getVarExp(), around line 1250.


            if (v->init)
            {
                if (v->init->isVoidInitializer())
                {
                        error(loc, "variable %s is used before initialization",
v->toChars());
                        return EXP_CANT_INTERPRET;
                }
                e = v->init->toExpression();
                e = e->interpret(istate);
            }
            else // This should never happen
            {
-                e = v->type->defaultInitLiteral();
+                e = v->type->defaultInitLiteral(loc);
                }

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to