http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3849
--- Comment #4 from [email protected] 2010-04-27 10:09:45 PDT --- Walter doesn't want to add the int[$] arr = [...]; syntax: > D is full of syntax, at some point adding more and more syntax to deal > with more and more obscure cases is not a net improvement. > There's a point of diminishing returns. I still think that when a static array literal is given, the compiler has to enforce the length of an array literal to be the same as the specified length. In the uncommon situations where a partial array specification is necessary, the programmer can just add leading empty items. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
