http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4177


Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch
                 CC|                            |clugd...@yahoo.com.au
            Version|future                      |2.041


--- Comment #1 from Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> 2010-06-08 11:38:37 PDT ---
Since __ctfe is so magical and unique, it seems justified to give it one more
special case. Other approaches I tried (changing the storage_class of __ctfe) 
were far more complicated.

PATCH expression.c, VarExp::semantic(), line 4397.

+            /* Magic variable __ctfe never violates pure or safe
+             */
+            if (v->ident == Id::ctfe)
+                return this;

            /* If ANY of its enclosing functions are pure,
             * it cannot do anything impure.
             * If it is pure, it cannot access any mutable variables other
             * than those inside itself
             */

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to