http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmail.com> 2010-07-05 18:12:14 PDT --- Good points, though would == function check when it was a function pointer rather than a function? In either case, I think that you should be able to check these in a consistent manner, which you can't do right now. With things spread out between built-in constructs, __traits, and std.traits, it can be a bit of a mess to figure out how to do something with compile-time reflection. Even if something like isType were simply translated to is(T), I think that having it would still be quite valuable since it would make the various compile-time reflection facilities more consistent and uniform. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------