> --- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-07-28 14:49:50 PDT --- > > (cut) > > By the way, what's the point in allowing/keeping ugly and error-prone function > literals in D2? > > It's better for D2 to keep/allow only _one_ standard, clean and readable > syntax > for functions pointers (and one for delegates, if necessary). Keeping C > function pointer syntax or something similar in D2 causes troubles.
Um.. stop that. Don't mix bug reports with discussion of only semi-related stuff together. Don't use bugzilla as a discussion thread in general.