http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661



--- Comment #5 from David Simcha <dsim...@yahoo.com> 2010-08-17 18:40:32 PDT ---
No, I'm saying that since the lambda function is bound at compile time, this
isn't a bug.  It's an intentional design tradeoff.  It **can't** be fixed
unless the lambda function is bound at runtime instead, which would prevent it
from being inlined, prevent implicit instantiation of the lambda function if
it's a template, etc.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to