David Simcha <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |

--- Comment #1 from David Simcha <> 2010-08-21 10:32:14 PDT ---
This is definitely a real bug in some capacity or another, but can you explain
to the unenlightened how [1:2, 3:4, 5:6] could possibly be construed as valid
int[] literal syntax?  I would have seen this as a pure implementation bug, not
a spec ambiguity issue as you imply it is.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to