http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmdavisp...@gmail.com --- Comment #26 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmail.com> 2010-08-22 13:50:51 PDT --- I don't know what the current state of stack traces is overall or where it is with regards to work being done on them, but I would point out that all you get on Linux right now is a list of addresses. e.g. object.except...@gregorian.d(241): Invalid year. ---------------- ./test() [0x805936a] ./test() [0x804b168] ./test() [0x804b269] ./test() [0x805b9fb] ./test() [0x8068d3c] ./test() [0x8060bed] ./test() [0x8068c57] ./test() [0x8061a88] ./test() [0x80619b0] ./test() [0x8061956] /opt/lib32/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6) [0xf75cdc76] ./test() [0x8049341] So, as it stands (using dmd 2.048), stack traces on Linux are pretty useless. I would assume that Sean is aware of this, but I thought that I should post a reminder of the current state of stack traces on Linux. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------