Stephan Dilly <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |

--- Comment #3 from Stephan Dilly <> 2010-08-26 15:14:48 PDT 
(In reply to comment #2)
> You are absolutely right. I forgot about the ability to make functions
> themselves const/immutable. It would really help if that right-side rule was 
> in
> place, because all this will do right now is cause confusion (unless we get a
> nicer error message, in which case we can keep the flexibility I think..).
> So maybe I should change this to an enhancement request for a better error
> message.

I disagree, just like any other storage class the current annotating enables
the user to group blocks of methods with equivalent storage classes like this:

class Foo{
void foo();

const(ConstReturnVal) bar();

it is nothing but consistent and should stay as it is.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to