http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4893
Summary: Function pointer assignments ignore constness Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- Comment #0 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> 2010-09-18 17:13:04 PDT --- Take this program: struct S { public: this(int[] function(const int[])func) { _func = func; } @property int[] function(const int[]) func() { return func; } private: int[] function(const int[]) _func; } int[] add1(int[] num) { return num ~ 1; } void main() { auto s = S(&add1); } It shouldn't compile, but it does. add1() does not take a const int[] and therefore could theoretically modify its arguments (though it doesn't here), violating the type of the function pointer. Using in and immutable instead of const has the same problem. They compile when they shouldn't. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------