http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4290
--- Comment #9 from Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com> 2010-09-21 06:16:08 PDT --- I will say the fact that sort does not use opCmp, but < does is bad. Worse than that, it uses a default opCmp which may appear to work but doesn't really. However the solution is not to disable other useful declarations of opCmp, but rather to fix sort. In fact, I think sort should be deprecated for std.algorithm.sort, which does use any opCmp defined. I'd like to see the whole "only save a function pointer in typeinfo if the signature matches exactly" just go away. I think we can solve these problems in better ways. It's a legacy thing that we can safely get rid of. Barring that, having a designation so the compiler can make an informed decision would be the second best option. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
