https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20539
berni44 <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from berni44 <[email protected]> --- (In reply to asumface from comment #0) > I believe both functions would handle this case correctly, not sure what > constraints opEquals touches to create this pathological case. opEquals is called by "is(typeof(value == OriginalType!T.init))" in the second overload. --
