https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20539

berni44 <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #1 from berni44 <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to asumface from comment #0)
> I believe both functions would handle this case correctly, not sure what
> constraints opEquals touches to create this pathological case.

opEquals is called by "is(typeof(value == OriginalType!T.init))" in the second
overload.

--

Reply via email to