https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18973
--- Comment #3 from LucienPe <[email protected]> --- (In reply to elpenguino+D from comment #2) > Incorrect. a @disabled method does not need a body, as no references to it > are ever emitted. You can observe this for yourself by simply renaming > toHash in the example to something without special semantics. Or by removing > const. Even a non-@disable'd method without a body doesn't generate linker > errors unless you try to call it. You're right. That was a workaround :P This bug is also valid for `toString()`. ``` struct Foo { @disable size_t toHash() const nothrow @safe; // linker fail @disable size_t toHash(); // ok @disable string toString(); // linker fail } class Bar { @disable override size_t toHash() const nothrow @safe; // linker fail @disable override size_t toHash(); // linker fail @disable override string toString(); // linker fail } ``` --
