http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5063
Walter Bright <bugzi...@digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright <bugzi...@digitalmars.com> 2010-10-25 01:08:31 PDT --- Code that compiles on 32 bits but fails to compile on 64 bits with an appropriate message is not much of a problem. Making size_t its own type rather than an alias brings along a whole host of other problems. Besides, it is perfectly legitimate to use an int to index an array on 64 bits. Also, it is D best practice to rewrite: int i = array.length; as: auto i = array.length; unless one *specifically* requires an int. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------