http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
--- Comment #8 from Walter Bright <[email protected]> 2010-10-29 10:29:39 PDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > In the existing compiler, they are disallowed. That's a bug. > ( void foo() nothrow { auto x = new int; } won't compile). > I just added error messages to specify why it was being disallowed. > It sounds as though the check for nothrow violations should be separated from > the code which determines if a statement can throw. That is, for 'new' and for > asm, we assume that it can throw. But, if it's in a nothrow function, we trust > the programmer. > Then, what happens if an out of memory condition happens in a nothrow > function? > Is the program simply terminated? Yes. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
