--- Comment #3 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 14:22:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It was once the case that bodyless functions are implicitly abstract. This
> partly changed
> but I don't know what change was made to the spec to reflect this.
Not sure, but I remember one case (far post dmd 1.000) where dmd silently
accepted a function without body as member of an abstract class, while it
caused linker errors on LDC.
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------