http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5129
--- Comment #3 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 14:22:28 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > It was once the case that bodyless functions are implicitly abstract. This > was > partly changed > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog1.html#new080 > but I don't know what change was made to the spec to reflect this. Not sure, but I remember one case (far post dmd 1.000) where dmd silently accepted a function without body as member of an abstract class, while it caused linker errors on LDC. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------