--- Comment #3 from 2010-10-30 14:22:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It was once the case that bodyless functions are implicitly abstract.  This 
> was
> partly changed
> but I don't know what change was made to the spec to reflect this.

Not sure, but I remember one case (far post dmd 1.000) where dmd silently
accepted a function without body as member of an abstract class, while it
caused linker errors on LDC.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to