https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21565
--- Comment #9 from Paul Backus <[email protected]> --- > I'm disagreeing with the ability of safe code to access any part of this. On what grounds? The point of @safe is to prevent undefined behavior, and allowing access to the integer cannot possibly lead to undefined behavior, because all integer values are safe values. > the current rules are sound, just nonsensical. It makes such unions pointless > when writing safe code. I agree--which is why I would like to replace them with rules that are both sound *and* sensical. Can we agree that that's a desirable goal? --
