https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22769

--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Panteleev <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Basile-z from comment #1)
> what is the background idea ? 

Making @property do its job

> Is this proposal a way to have opCall called without explicit CallExp ?

No. () is the CallExp. It should be applied to the return value, not the
property. Without @property, the code should behave as it does now.

--

Reply via email to