https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22769
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Panteleev <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Basile-z from comment #1) > what is the background idea ? Making @property do its job > Is this proposal a way to have opCall called without explicit CallExp ? No. () is the CallExp. It should be applied to the return value, not the property. Without @property, the code should behave as it does now. --
