http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-12-14 13:24:26 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > But then we're not looking for a syntax that would also allows us to use auto > (as in "auto a = [1,2,3,4];"), is that what we're saying? Now I think I understand what you mean. You mean something like: auto[$] a = [1,2,3,4]; ==> int[4] So auto lets the D compiler infer the element type and count the items, but the result is a fixed-length array still. I think this case is not common enough to deserve a third syntax. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
