http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1348
Rob Jacques <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |spec --- Comment #7 from Rob Jacques <[email protected]> 2010-12-27 13:46:23 PST --- nfxjfg, as noted in this bug report, this isn't a regression: D has never had any form of runtime-reflection so Walter can't have disabled it, etc. To the best of my knowledge, the shape of D's runtime reflection is still pending. Gide, you're technically right, but I feel there's a big difference in severity between, not implemented yet and silently generating incorrect code. I have added the spec keyword, because it's probably a good idea to remove the Offset type info placeholders until D's runtime-reflection strategy is defined. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
