http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1348


Rob Jacques <sandf...@jhu.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |spec


--- Comment #7 from Rob Jacques <sandf...@jhu.edu> 2010-12-27 13:46:23 PST ---
nfxjfg, as noted in this bug report, this isn't a regression: D has never had
any form of runtime-reflection so Walter can't have disabled it, etc. To the
best of my knowledge, the shape of D's runtime reflection is still pending. 

Gide, you're technically right, but I feel there's a big difference in severity
between, not implemented yet and silently generating incorrect code. I have
added the spec keyword, because it's probably a good idea to remove the Offset
type info placeholders until D's runtime-reflection strategy is defined.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to