https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15563
Nick Treleaven <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Nick Treleaven <[email protected]> --- So should storage classes which only apply to functions be added to FunctionAttributeKwd? abstract final override synchronized It seems inconsistent only to allow nothrow and pure as postfix. OTOH perhaps function attribute keywords should be allowed as @attributes, then they would be supported already as postfix. --
