http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5488
--- Comment #2 from Sean Kelly <[email protected]> 2011-01-31 11:16:51 PST --- After some testing, it looks like I was right. I have a fix for this, but it's far from ideal (though the diff is small): require everything but thread_resumeAll to acquire two locks in sequence, while thread_resumeAll only acquires the second. I'll try to come up with something better. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
