http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5488



--- Comment #2 from Sean Kelly <s...@invisibleduck.org> 2011-01-31 11:16:51 PST 
---
After some testing, it looks like I was right.  I have a fix for this, but it's
far from ideal (though the diff is small): require everything but
thread_resumeAll to acquire two locks in sequence, while thread_resumeAll only
acquires the second.  I'll try to come up with something better.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to