https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24717
--- Comment #10 from Max Samukha <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Manu from comment #8) > Nar, 'incorrect' is the only possible description, and I will die on this > hill. > "Most people" is an understatement ;) > > 'Explaining' things at the expense of reality is a physiological trap that > our kind fall into very easily. > This particular thing has gone on for way way too long, and it's time we put > it to bed. Anyway, if you guys are going to "fix" that, please make sure that there is still a way to get a "contextless" reference to a member, that is, (an alternative of) this still works: void apply(alias foo)(ref S s) { assert (__traits(child, s, foo) == 1); int delegate() dg; dg.ptr = &s; dg.funcptr = &foo; assert(dg() == 1); } struct S { int x; int foo() => x; } void main() { S s = S(1); apply!(S.foo)(s); } --
