http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5623


Sean Kelly <s...@invisibleduck.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |s...@invisibleduck.org


--- Comment #10 from Sean Kelly <s...@invisibleduck.org> 2011-02-22 15:01:51 
PST ---
I think the separation of pools for large and small allocations is a good
thing.  In fact, the current collector will return entirely free pools to the
OS at the end of a collection cycle, so the two are already logically separate.
 I can't think of a case where performance would be worse than before, but I'll
give the patch a once-over to be sure.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to