http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5935



--- Comment #4 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-05-06 11:26:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm worried about this development. Before long we could get to the point 
> where
> a lot of ranges get bloated to support two iteration methods because opApply
> has capabilities that ranges don't.
> 
> To prevent that we should improve range-based iteration to provide good 
> support
> for foreach, and leave opApply to entities that need internal iteration.

Implement (a subset of) issue 4579?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to